S1 EP.7 – No Rules on a Seesaw – A review of bad Movie/Adaptation Series pt.1

The guys (Kareem, Ken, and Pat) are joined by special guest J.P.G. to review some of the worst comic movies and or adaptations. Tangents include Benjamin Bratt’s basketball rider, Lex Luthor’s copyright master plan, Jesse Eisenberg awfulness, and more.



Show Notes

Topic 1:  Establish what constitutes a comic movie and its timeframe

Just before the turn of the century, not much was happening in the way of live-action comic book films. DC’s run of solid Batman and Superman franchises came to a swift halt with Batman and Robin, which virtually killed the Dark Knight as a big screen presence, while movies like Steel did little to win over fans. On the other hand, Marvel’s relatively successful Blade was sandwiched in between the first in a line of poor Fantastic Four attempts, and the straight-to-television Nick Fury: Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D., which starred David Hasselhoff in the lead role.

Everything changed in 2000, with the introduction of the X-Men to mainstream cinema. Not long after, Sam Raimi and Christopher Nolan sealed the long-term success of the genre, with their Spider-Man and Dark Knight trilogies raking in huge rewards both critically and financially.

Unfortunately, what followed was mass hysteria from DC, Marvel, Sony and Fox, who each collected the rights to their respective characters and rushed out a tidal wave of superhero movies in blatant attempts to one-up the rest. Even now in the days of shared universes, we are seeing more and more movies fail to live up to the standard set by those early X-Men and Spider-Man films.

Topic 2: Breakdown what constitutes a bad movie/ comic adaptation?

  • See additional pages for breakdowns

Topic 3: Honorable Mentions

  • See additional page for details

Topic 4: Wrap up with a general consensus


EP.123 – Post Decpte-Con Catch Up – A Review of Comic-Con News 2026 Tangential Giants Podcast

Kareem finally reconnects with Ken and Pat after missing their Comic‑Con panel, and the guys waste no time recapping how their talk on the downfall of billionaires in comics somehow turned into a crowd‑pleaser. Pat insists they were profound. Ken insists they were unhinged. Both are probably right.From there, the conversation swerves into the tall grass. The trio tries to figure out why Transformers actually transform, whether “Decepticons” is a name that should have been retired decades ago, and how to stitch G.I. Joe, Transformers, and the Fast and the Furious into one cinematic universe without breaking the laws of physics or taste.It is exactly the kind of episode where a simple Comic‑Con debrief becomes a dissertation on toy‑based geopolitics, automotive theology, and franchise chaos theory.Settle in. It gets weird fast.#TangentialGiants #ComicCon #Transformers #GIJoe #FastAndFurious #NerdCulture #PopCulturePodcast #GeekTalk #ComicBookLore #MovieUniverses #PodcastLife #FandomTalk #ToyLore #FranchiseChaos
  1. EP.123 – Post Decpte-Con Catch Up – A Review of Comic-Con News 2026
  2. EP.122 – Wait, You Know Kung Fu Too? – A Review of The State of Martial Arts Films pt.2
  3. EP.121 – Catching Bullets With His Teeth – A Review of The State of Martial Arts Films pt.1
  4. EP.120 – Jimmy Olsen's Manosphere Problem – A Review of James Gunn's Superman pt.4
  5. Shawarma vs Falafel vs Vaccines – A Review of James Gunn's Superman pt.2


Leave a comment